GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO
GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOGY.TO achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 39.35% return.
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 123.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 39.35%
- 6M
- 37.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 14.33% | 58.47% |
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 39.35% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOGY.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GOGY.TO
CNQE.TO
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOGY.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOGY.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.31 | 2.48 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOGY.TO and CNQE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOGY.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -18.22% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.57% | -6.08% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -4.12% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | — | — |
Volatility
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOGY.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.67% | 33.12% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.61% | 33.12% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.61% | 33.12% | +1.49% |
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOGY.TO and CNQE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
GOGY.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison
GOGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than CNQE.TO's 9.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 9.40% | 4.42% |
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 12.78% | 8.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOGY.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOGY.TO and CNQE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Find the right allocation for GOGY.TO and CNQE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer