GOF vs. PUTW
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW).
GOF is an actively managed fund by Guggenheim. It was launched on Jul 26, 2007. PUTW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Volos U.S. Large Cap Target 2.5% PutWrite Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2016.
Performance
GOF vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOF vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -10.50% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
PUTW WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund | -1.66% | 14.45% | 17.18% | 15.53% | -10.11% | 20.94% | 1.65% | 13.55% | -7.16% | 10.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOF achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly lower than PUTW's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GOF has outperformed PUTW with an annualized return of 8.35%, while PUTW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.
GOF
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -19.80%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
PUTW
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOF vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOF has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GOF vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank
GOF
PUTW
GOF vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOF | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | 1.10 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | 1.65 | -2.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.27 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 1.62 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 8.70 | -10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOF | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 1.10 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.77 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.59 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.61 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOF and PUTW is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GOF vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison
GOF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.83%, more than PUTW's 12.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 19.83% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
PUTW WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund | 12.37% | 13.18% | 11.99% | 8.94% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 6.46% | 3.52% | 2.27% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GOF vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOF drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, which is greater than PUTW's maximum drawdown of -28.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOF and PUTW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOF | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -28.40% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.24% | -9.90% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.41% | -16.56% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | -28.40% | -10.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.28% | -4.73% | -15.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -3.48% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.31% | 1.85% | +8.46% |
Volatility
GOF vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (PUTW) at 4.77%. This indicates that GOF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOF | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.77% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.88% | 7.82% | +9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 14.33% | +6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 12.21% | +6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 13.23% | +6.25% |