GOEX vs. FJP
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while FJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOEX returned 12.61%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for FJP. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FJP.
Performance
GOEX vs. FJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than FJP's 12.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GOEX has outperformed FJP with an annualized return of 12.61%, while FJP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.
GOEX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- 52.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
FJP
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
GOEX vs. FJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -10.45% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 12.56% | 33.60% | 5.80% | 23.00% | -12.83% | -1.13% | 3.60% | 7.72% | -18.60% | 27.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and FJP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, GOEX and FJP have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
GOEX vs. FJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOEX
FJP
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GOEX
FJP
Communication Services
GOEX
-
FJP
Consumer Cyclical
GOEX
-
FJP
Consumer Defensive
GOEX
-
FJP
Energy
GOEX
-
FJP
Financial Services
GOEX
-
FJP
Healthcare
GOEX
-
FJP
Industrials
GOEX
-
FJP
Real Estate
GOEX
-
FJP
Technology
GOEX
-
FJP
Utilities
GOEX
-
FJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. FJP — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
FJP
GOEX vs. FJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOEX | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.22 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 6.55 | -2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. FJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than FJP's maximum drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and FJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -41.51% | -47.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.64% | -14.43% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -17.02% | -22.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -31.88% | -15.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | -41.51% | -12.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.91% | -7.75% | -26.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -11.45% | -52.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.30% | 4.89% | +9.41% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. FJP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) at 7.16%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | FJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 7.16% | +9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.66% | 17.43% | +24.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.58% | 21.00% | +29.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.35% | 20.43% | +18.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 18.91% | +21.21% |
GOEX vs. FJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FJP's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOEX vs. FJP - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than FJP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.32% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOEX and FJP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to FJP (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs FJP's -41.51%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 12.61% vs 7.61% for FJP. On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FJP has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FJP.
FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.32% for GOEX.
GOEX is categorized as Materials, while FJP is Japan Equities. GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while FJP tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.80% for FJP.
FJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and FJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer