PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOEX vs. EART
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOEX vs. EART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -5.02% return, which is significantly lower than EART's 17.65% return.


GOEX

1D
-4.11%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-5.02%
6M
2.89%
1Y
64.25%
3Y*
46.31%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%

EART

1D
-1.81%
1M
2.78%
YTD
17.65%
6M
28.34%
1Y
118.80%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOEX vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
-5.02%179.50%19.38%1.99%-8.41%
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
17.65%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GOEX and EART is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.57

The correlation between GOEX and EART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOEX vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOEX
GOEX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOEX vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOEXEARTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

4.59

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

14.55

-9.61

GOEX vs. EART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the EART Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOEX and EART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOEXEARTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

3.15

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.27

-0.25

Drawdowns

GOEX vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than EART's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and EART.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOEXEARTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.83%

-53.68%

-35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.78%

-26.03%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.78%

-37.20%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.90%

-10.88%

-19.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.59%

-29.15%

-34.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.04%

8.19%

+4.85%

Volatility

GOEX vs. EART - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) at 11.14%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOEXEARTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

11.14%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.87%

31.37%

+8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.13%

37.95%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.00%

33.97%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.97%

33.97%

+6.00%

GOEX vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EART's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOEX vs. EART - Dividend Comparison

GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than EART's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.55%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
2.19%2.08%2.46%0.05%1.04%2.35%2.62%1.60%0.00%0.00%38.91%11.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOEX and EART have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOEX has higher volatility (14.62%) compared to EART (11.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs EART's -53.68%.

On 3-year performance, GOEX leads with 46.31% vs 21.75% for EART. On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EART has been the lower-risk option at 11.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 46.31% return vs 21.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.

GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.55% for EART.

GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.59% for EART.

EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOEX and EART

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer