GOEX vs. ARKQ
GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) and ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOEX is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return, while ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK. GOEX is passively managed, while ARKQ is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GOEX returned 13.58%/yr vs 22.08%/yr for ARKQ. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKQ.
Performance
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOEX achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GOEX has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 13.58%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.
GOEX
- 1D
- 7.67%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 47.73%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -3.57% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOEX and ARKQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between GOEX and ARKQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GOEX
ARKQ
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GOEX
ARKQ
-
Industrials
GOEX
ARKQ
Communication Services
GOEX
-
ARKQ
Consumer Cyclical
GOEX
-
ARKQ
Consumer Defensive
GOEX
-
ARKQ
-
Energy
GOEX
-
ARKQ
Financial Services
GOEX
-
ARKQ
-
Healthcare
GOEX
-
ARKQ
Real Estate
GOEX
-
ARKQ
-
Technology
GOEX
-
ARKQ
Utilities
GOEX
-
ARKQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOEX vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
GOEX
ARKQ
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOEX | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.13 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 9.22 | -4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOEX drawdown since its inception was -88.83%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOEX and ARKQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOEX | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.83% | -59.89% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.64% | -20.58% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.64% | -30.76% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | -55.71% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.66% | -59.89% | +6.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.84% | -6.35% | -22.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -17.21% | -46.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.42% | 6.98% | +7.44% |
Volatility
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a higher volatility of 18.95% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 13.37%. This indicates that GOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOEX | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.95% | 13.37% | +5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.19% | 26.41% | +15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.19% | 33.76% | +17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.51% | 32.56% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.16% | 30.01% | +10.15% |
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOEX vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
GOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than ARKQ's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.16% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOEX and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (18.95%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOEX dropped -88.83% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 13.58% for GOEX. On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
GOEX is categorized as Gold, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GOEX and 0.75% for ARKQ.
ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOEX and ARKQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer