GOCT vs. DNOV
GOCT (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October) and DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) are both exchange-traded funds - GOCT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while DNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. GOCT is actively managed, while DNOV is passively managed. Over the past year, GOCT returned 14.86% vs 16.14% for DNOV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
GOCT vs. DNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOCT achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly higher than DNOV's 4.40% return.
GOCT
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DNOV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 16.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
GOCT vs. DNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October | 5.00% | 12.29% | 8.16% | 6.96% |
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 4.40% | 13.93% | 10.71% | 10.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOCT and DNOV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GOCT and DNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOCT vs. DNOV — Risk / Return Rank
GOCT
DNOV
GOCT vs. DNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOCT | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.88 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.78 | 20.65 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOCT vs. DNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOCT drawdown since its inception was -10.47%, smaller than the maximum DNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOCT and DNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOCT | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.47% | -15.03% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -4.18% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.63% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -2.00% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.78% | +0.11% |
Volatility
GOCT vs. DNOV - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) at 1.50%. This indicates that GOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOCT | DNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 1.50% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 4.34% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.09% | 5.72% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 7.63% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 9.01% | -1.57% |
GOCT vs. DNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOCT and DNOV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
GOCT vs. DNOV - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOCT nor DNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GOCT and DNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GOCT has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to DNOV (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOCT dropped -10.47% vs DNOV's -15.03%.
On 1-year performance, DNOV leads with 16.14% vs 14.86% for GOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DNOV has performed better with a 16.14% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOCT and DNOV have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
GOCT and DNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GOCT is categorized as Options Trading, while DNOV is Defined Outcome.
DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOCT and DNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer