GOCT vs. AAPR
GOCT (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October) and AAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOCT returned 16.05% vs 9.83% for AAPR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for AAPR.
Performance
GOCT vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOCT achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than AAPR's 3.82% return.
GOCT
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 16.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPR
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOCT vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GOCT FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October | 5.42% | 12.29% | 4.57% |
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 | 3.82% | 7.79% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOCT and AAPR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GOCT and AAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOCT vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank
GOCT
AAPR
GOCT vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOCT | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.99 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 12.12 | -8.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.29 | 62.99 | -44.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOCT | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 4.18 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 1.73 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GOCT vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOCT drawdown since its inception was -10.47%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOCT and AAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOCT | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.47% | -5.99% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -0.81% | -3.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.15% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -0.45% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.16% | +0.72% |
Volatility
GOCT vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.68%. This indicates that GOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOCT | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 0.68% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.72% | 1.57% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.05% | 2.36% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.45% | 4.81% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.45% | 4.81% | +2.64% |
GOCT vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOCT vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOCT nor AAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOCT and AAPR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOCT has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOCT dropped -10.47% vs AAPR's -5.99%.
On 1-year performance, GOCT leads with 16.05% vs 9.83% for AAPR. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOCT has performed better with a 16.05% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GOCT.
GOCT and AAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GOCT and 0.79% for AAPR.
AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOCT and AAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer