GNXIX vs. UCEQX
GNXIX (AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund) and UCEQX (USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GNXIX returned -0.28%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for UCEQX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GNXIX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for UCEQX.
Performance
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNXIX achieves a -13.26% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 14.26% return.
GNXIX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -13.54%
- 6M
- -26.88%
- YTD
- -13.26%
- 1Y
- -7.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- —
UCEQX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 26.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNXIX AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund | -13.26% | 22.71% | 24.96% | 7.21% | -32.53% | 5.95% | 40.26% | 27.85% | -18.74% | 20.66% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 14.26% | 23.71% | 14.50% | 19.36% | -16.25% | 19.68% | 10.76% | 22.49% | -12.06% | 9.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNXIX and UCEQX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between GNXIX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNXIX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank
GNXIX
UCEQX
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund (GNXIX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GNXIX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.38 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 3.03 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 13.07 | -13.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNXIX drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNXIX and UCEQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNXIX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.17% | -35.33% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.56% | -8.96% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.69% | -15.64% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.91% | -25.24% | -20.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.62% | -0.34% | -28.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -4.84% | -12.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.39% | 2.07% | +12.32% |
Volatility
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund (GNXIX) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) at 3.71%. This indicates that GNXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNXIX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 3.71% | +7.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.73% | 10.92% | +19.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.60% | 13.14% | +27.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 15.40% | +12.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 16.44% | +8.19% |
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNXIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GNXIX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison
GNXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than UCEQX's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNXIX AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund | 1.37% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.18% | 4.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 1.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 4.44% | 5.08% | 2.56% | 5.10% | 6.80% | 4.61% | 8.25% | 4.79% | 6.73% | 1.91% | 3.16% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GNXIX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNXIX has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to UCEQX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNXIX dropped -46.17% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.
UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNXIX and UCEQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer