PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNR vs. XLRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNR vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than XLRE's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GNR has outperformed XLRE with an annualized return of 10.19%, while XLRE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.96% annualized return.


GNR

1D
-3.78%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
15.74%
6M
18.87%
1Y
37.17%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
10.19%

XLRE

1D
0.68%
1M
0.65%
YTD
11.53%
6M
10.98%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
6.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNR vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
15.74%28.68%-8.27%2.95%10.20%24.73%-0.03%16.49%-13.19%22.64%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
11.53%2.63%5.09%12.36%-26.25%46.10%-2.18%28.68%-2.39%10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GNR and XLRE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2015

0.38

GNR vs. XLRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GNR
XLRE

Basic Materials

50.3%
1.9%

Energy

37.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Real Estate

0.8%
98.0%

Industrials

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Technology

-

-

Basic Materials

GNR
50.3%
XLRE
1.9%

Energy

GNR
37.6%
XLRE

-

Consumer Cyclical

GNR
6.3%
XLRE

-

Consumer Defensive

GNR
4.6%
XLRE

-

Real Estate

GNR
0.8%
XLRE
98.0%

Industrials

GNR
0.2%
XLRE

-

Financial Services

GNR
0.0%
XLRE

-

Healthcare

GNR
0.0%
XLRE

-

Utilities

GNR
0.0%
XLRE

-

Communication Services

GNR

-

XLRE

-

Technology

GNR

-

XLRE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNR vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNR vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNRXLREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.14

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

1.30

+3.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

3.56

+14.53

GNR vs. XLRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the XLRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNR and XLRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNRXLREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.80

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.18

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.34

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.36

-0.11

Drawdowns

GNR vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, which is greater than XLRE's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and XLRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNRXLREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.37%

-38.83%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-8.33%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-16.74%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-34.12%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.59%

-38.83%

-9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-0.32%

-4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-9.60%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.03%

-0.97%

Volatility

GNR vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) at 4.10%. This indicates that GNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNRXLREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

4.10%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

9.87%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

13.59%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

19.08%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

20.40%

+1.50%

GNR vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRE's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNR vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison

GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than XLRE's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
2.56%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.13%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNR and XLRE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNR has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to XLRE (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNR dropped -51.37% vs XLRE's -38.83%.

On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 10.19% vs 6.96% for XLRE. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 10.19% return vs 6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.

XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.56% for GNR.

GNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while XLRE is REIT. GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index, while XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GNR and 0.13% for XLRE.

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNR and XLRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer