PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNR vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNR vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GNR having a 20.27% return and TURF slightly lower at 19.55%.


GNR

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.20%
YTD
20.27%
6M
23.12%
1Y
43.10%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
10.91%

TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNR vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GNR and TURF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.93

GNR vs. TURF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GNR
TURF

Basic Materials

50.3%
33.9%

Energy

37.6%
29.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
8.5%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%
1.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
2.3%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%
0.3%

Communication Services

-

3.8%

Technology

-

0.4%

Basic Materials

GNR
50.3%
TURF
33.9%

Energy

GNR
37.6%
TURF
29.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GNR
6.3%
TURF

-

Consumer Defensive

GNR
4.6%
TURF
8.5%

Real Estate

GNR
0.8%
TURF

-

Industrials

GNR
0.2%
TURF
1.6%

Financial Services

GNR
0.0%
TURF
2.3%

Healthcare

GNR
0.0%
TURF

-

Utilities

GNR
0.0%
TURF
0.3%

Communication Services

GNR

-

TURF
3.8%

Technology

GNR

-

TURF
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNR vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TURF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNR vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNRTURFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.28

GNR vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNRTURFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

2.52

-2.26

Drawdowns

GNR vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and TURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNRTURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.37%

-6.84%

-44.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-2.54%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-1.53%

-13.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

GNR vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNRTURFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

16.50%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

16.50%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

16.50%

+5.38%

GNR vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNR vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than TURF's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
2.47%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
1.25%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GNR and TURF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TURF.

GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.25% for TURF.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GNR and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNR and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer