PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNR vs. GOVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNR vs. GOVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than GOVT's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GNR has outperformed GOVT with an annualized return of 10.19%, while GOVT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.86% annualized return.


GNR

1D
-3.78%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
15.74%
6M
18.87%
1Y
37.17%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
10.19%

GOVT

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
0.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNR vs. GOVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
15.74%28.68%-8.27%2.95%10.20%24.73%-0.03%16.49%-13.19%22.64%
GOVT
iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
-0.33%3.77%2.95%4.17%-13.39%-1.11%7.28%7.36%0.26%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GNR and GOVT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

-0.16

The correlation between GNR and GOVT shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNR vs. GOVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GOVT
GOVT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GOVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNR vs. GOVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNRGOVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.15

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

1.12

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

3.25

+14.84

GNR vs. GOVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the GOVT Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNR and GOVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNRGOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.89

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

-0.08

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.16

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.26

-0.01

Drawdowns

GNR vs. GOVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, which is greater than GOVT's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and GOVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNRGOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.37%

-19.07%

-32.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-2.85%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-5.43%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-16.60%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.59%

-19.07%

-29.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-7.38%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-5.25%

-9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.98%

+1.08%

Volatility

GNR vs. GOVT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (GOVT) at 1.06%. This indicates that GNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNRGOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

1.06%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

2.54%

+11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

3.60%

+13.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

6.04%

+14.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

5.22%

+16.68%

GNR vs. GOVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GOVT's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNR vs. GOVT - Dividend Comparison

GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than GOVT's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
2.56%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%
GOVT
iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
3.59%3.49%3.14%2.65%1.77%0.96%2.17%1.98%1.97%1.57%1.40%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNR and GOVT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNR has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to GOVT (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNR dropped -51.37% vs GOVT's -19.07%.

On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 10.19% vs 0.86% for GOVT. On fees, GOVT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GOVT has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 10.19% return vs 0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOVT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.

GOVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.56% for GNR.

GNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while GOVT is Government Bonds. GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index, while GOVT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Core Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GNR and 0.05% for GOVT.

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNR and GOVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer