PortfoliosLab logo
GNMA vs. LMBS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GNMA and LMBS is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

GNMA vs. LMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

GNMA:

5.98%

LMBS:

2.26%

Max Drawdown

GNMA:

-17.09%

LMBS:

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

GNMA:

-4.94%

LMBS:

-0.13%

Returns By Period


GNMA

YTD

2.63%

1M

1.59%

6M

1.66%

1Y

5.91%

5Y*

-0.90%

10Y*

0.87%

LMBS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GNMA vs. LMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNMA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LMBS's 0.68% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GNMA vs. LMBS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNMA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GNMA is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GNMA is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GNMA is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GNMA is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GNMA is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GNMA is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

LMBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMBS is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GNMA vs. LMBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

GNMA vs. LMBS - Dividend Comparison

GNMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, while LMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GNMA
iShares GNMA Bond ETF
4.14%4.15%3.43%2.01%0.64%1.89%2.61%2.41%2.15%1.89%1.50%1.22%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GNMA vs. LMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNMA drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, which is greater than LMBS's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMA and LMBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GNMA vs. LMBS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...