GNMA vs. JMBS
GNMA (iShares GNMA Bond ETF) and JMBS (Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. GNMA is passively managed, while JMBS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GNMA returned 0.53%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for JMBS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GNMA charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for JMBS.
Performance
GNMA vs. JMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNMA achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than JMBS's 0.51% return.
GNMA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
JMBS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 7.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
GNMA vs. JMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNMA iShares GNMA Bond ETF | 0.56% | 8.25% | 1.07% | 5.34% | -10.83% | -1.86% | 3.51% | 5.85% | 1.81% |
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.51% | 8.82% | 1.53% | 5.66% | -11.40% | -0.32% | 5.80% | 7.11% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNMA and JMBS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GNMA and JMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNMA vs. JMBS — Risk / Return Rank
GNMA
JMBS
GNMA vs. JMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNMA | JMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.36 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 7.80 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNMA | JMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 1.67 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GNMA vs. JMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNMA drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, roughly equal to the maximum JMBS drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNMA and JMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNMA | JMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.09% | -16.68% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -3.05% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.13% | -7.76% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.83% | -16.68% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -1.66% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -3.90% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 0.92% | -0.10% |
Volatility
GNMA vs. JMBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares GNMA Bond ETF (GNMA) is 1.54%, while Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that GNMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNMA | JMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.65% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 3.23% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 4.31% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 6.49% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 5.52% | -0.39% |
GNMA vs. JMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNMA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBS's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
GNMA vs. JMBS - Dividend Comparison
GNMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than JMBS's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNMA iShares GNMA Bond ETF | 4.24% | 4.19% | 4.15% | 3.43% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.89% | 2.61% | 2.41% | 2.15% | 1.89% | 1.50% |
JMBS Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.19% | 5.03% | 5.53% | 4.38% | 2.73% | 1.16% | 2.92% | 3.63% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GNMA and JMBS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMBS has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to GNMA (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNMA dropped -17.09% vs JMBS's -16.68%.
On 5-year performance, JMBS leads with 0.74% vs 0.53% for GNMA. On fees, GNMA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GNMA has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMBS has performed better with a 0.74% return vs 0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GNMA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for JMBS.
JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 4.24% for GNMA.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GNMA and 0.32% for JMBS.
JMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNMA and JMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer