PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMXAX vs. NDAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund (NDAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMXAX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than NDAAX's 12.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GMXAX has underperformed NDAAX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while NDAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


GMXAX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.36%
YTD
12.95%
6M
14.04%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
9.33%

NDAAX

1D
0.37%
1M
4.17%
YTD
12.23%
6M
13.72%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
12.95%6.84%12.15%15.89%-13.45%24.33%12.79%25.35%-10.65%2.80%
NDAAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund
12.23%17.35%14.01%20.48%-18.33%17.16%13.37%21.59%-10.35%17.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GMXAX and NDAAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2000

0.92

The correlation between GMXAX and NDAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMXAX vs. NDAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMXAX
GMXAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GMXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GMXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NDAAX
NDAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NDAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NDAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund (NDAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMXAXNDAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

2.35

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

3.31

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.19

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.16

13.85

-3.69

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the NDAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMXAX and NDAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMXAXNDAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.35

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.58

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.34

+0.07

Drawdowns

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMXAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, roughly equal to the maximum NDAAX drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMXAX and NDAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMXAXNDAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.64%

-55.26%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-8.70%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.21%

-15.84%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-29.50%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-36.67%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-10.42%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.00%

+0.43%

Volatility

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund (NDAAX) at 3.67%. This indicates that GMXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMXAXNDAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

3.67%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

9.43%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

11.87%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

15.93%

+3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

16.92%

+4.38%

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMXAX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than NDAAX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMXAX vs. NDAAX - Dividend Comparison

GMXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than NDAAX's 9.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
11.54%12.93%11.73%6.17%9.58%12.52%3.18%5.18%23.21%0.85%9.60%13.94%
NDAAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund
9.52%10.60%18.58%5.92%3.68%6.69%5.75%8.80%14.29%12.98%9.26%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMXAX and NDAAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMXAX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to NDAAX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMXAX dropped -55.64% vs NDAAX's -55.26%.

NDAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMXAX and NDAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer