NDAAX vs. GBIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund (NDAAX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX).
NDAAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Mar 29, 2000. GBIAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Dec 29, 1999.
Performance
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDAAX Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund | -0.74% | 17.35% | 14.01% | 20.48% | -18.33% | 17.16% | 13.37% | 21.59% | -10.35% | 17.71% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | -0.40% | 6.54% | 0.44% | 5.03% | -14.06% | -2.38% | 6.60% | 8.08% | -0.74% | 2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDAAX achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than GBIAX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NDAAX has outperformed GBIAX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while GBIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.
NDAAX
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
GBIAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDAAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIAX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NDAAX vs. GBIAX — Risk / Return Rank
NDAAX
GBIAX
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund (NDAAX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NDAAX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 0.77 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.10 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.14 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.40 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 3.85 | +3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NDAAX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.77 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.10 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.18 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.73 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between NDAAX and GBIAX is -0.15. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Dividend Comparison
NDAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.77%, more than GBIAX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDAAX Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund | 10.77% | 10.60% | 18.58% | 5.92% | 3.68% | 6.69% | 5.75% | 8.80% | 14.29% | 12.98% | 9.26% | 7.45% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | 2.97% | 3.18% | 3.07% | 2.57% | 1.59% | 3.02% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDAAX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than GBIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDAAX and GBIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDAAX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -20.26% | -35.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -2.73% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.50% | -19.07% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | -20.26% | -16.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -6.78% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.48% | -3.02% | -7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 0.99% | +1.45% |
Volatility
NDAAX vs. GBIAX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Investor Destinations Aggressive Fund (NDAAX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) at 1.54%. This indicates that NDAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NDAAX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 1.54% | +4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 2.62% | +6.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 4.36% | +11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 5.98% | +9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 4.94% | +11.94% |