PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMWAX vs. JNSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) and Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMWAX achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than JNSMX's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GMWAX has outperformed JNSMX with an annualized return of 7.39%, while JNSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


GMWAX

1D
1.08%
1M
1.64%
6M
8.00%
YTD
12.58%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
7.39%
ALL TIME*
3.47%

JNSMX

1D
1.42%
1M
-1.04%
6M
4.16%
YTD
6.42%
1Y
13.95%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
6.48%
ALL TIME*
5.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
12.58%23.40%0.23%16.17%-12.71%7.03%6.15%17.70%-7.21%15.73%
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
6.42%15.72%8.87%11.71%-17.38%7.25%14.46%15.62%-6.57%16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GMWAX and JNSMX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2005

0.91

The correlation between GMWAX and JNSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMWAX vs. JNSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMWAX
GMWAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GMWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

JNSMX
JNSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
JNSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) and Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMWAXJNSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.25

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

1.88

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

7.75

+5.89

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMWAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the JNSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMWAX and JNSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMWAX drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, roughly equal to the maximum JNSMX drawdown of -39.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMWAX and JNSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMWAXJNSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-39.85%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-7.00%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-10.60%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-25.15%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.12%

-25.15%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.79%

+1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-5.90%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.69%

+0.15%

Volatility

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund (GMWAX) is 2.44%, while Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that GMWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMWAXJNSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.97%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

8.45%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.25%

9.76%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.08%

10.62%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.33%

10.22%

+0.11%

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMWAX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JNSMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GMWAX vs. JNSMX - Dividend Comparison

GMWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than JNSMX's 5.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMWAX
GMO Global Asset Allocation Fund
4.42%4.88%0.14%5.47%3.78%6.16%4.00%4.00%3.77%2.50%2.25%3.13%
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
5.55%5.90%4.28%1.53%2.96%13.36%4.49%5.72%4.86%7.24%1.87%9.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GMWAX and JNSMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JNSMX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to GMWAX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMWAX dropped -41.69% vs JNSMX's -39.85%.

GMWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMWAX and JNSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer