PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMVM.DE vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GMVM.DE is traded in EUR, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMVM.DE achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GMVM.DE has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.29%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.


GMVM.DE

1D
0.97%
1M
2.94%
YTD
-1.57%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
10.29%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
4.36%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.32%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
15.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMVM.DE
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
-1.57%-4.56%17.59%14.37%-14.38%36.91%2.73%38.45%2.27%7.97%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.58%3.84%33.23%22.54%-13.10%38.43%8.57%34.33%-0.02%6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GMVM.DE and VOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.54

The correlation between GMVM.DE and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMVM.DE vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMVM.DE
GMVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GMVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMVM.DEVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

3.73

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

14.10

-12.73

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMVM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMVM.DE and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMVM.DEVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.26

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.90

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.83

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.90

-0.28

Drawdowns

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMVM.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.25%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMVM.DE and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMVM.DEVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.25%

-33.49%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-7.37%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-23.87%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-23.87%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.25%

-33.49%

+1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.18%

-0.18%

-10.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.03%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

1.94%

+2.75%

Volatility

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.06%. This indicates that GMVM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMVM.DEVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.06%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

8.55%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

12.20%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

16.69%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

18.53%

-1.99%

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMVM.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMVM.DE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GMVM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMVM.DE
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMVM.DE and VOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GMVM.DE.

GMVM.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. GMVM.DE tracks Morningstar US Sustainable Moat Focus, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GMVM.DE and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMVM.DE and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer