PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMUN vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMUN vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GMUN

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPI

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.50%
6M
18.80%
YTD
20.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMUN vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GMUN and MLPI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMUN vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GMUN vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMUN vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMUNMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

Volatility

GMUN vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMUNMLPIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

GMUN vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUN has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMUN vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

GMUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GMUN
Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.94%3.22%2.20%
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
7.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMUN and MLPI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GMUN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GMUN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.12%, compared with 2.87% for GMUN.

GMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GMUN and 0.68% for MLPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMUN and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer