PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMUB vs. GHYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMUB vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMUB vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMUB
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
0.44%5.99%1.08%
GHYB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
-0.22%9.38%3.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMUB achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than GHYB's -0.22% return.


GMUB

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
0.44%
6M
2.28%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GHYB

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
0.83%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GMUB vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMUB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GMUB vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMUB
GMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYB
GHYB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMUB vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMUBGHYBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.32

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.00

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.82

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.33

9.37

-2.04

GMUB vs. GHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMUB Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the GHYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMUB and GHYB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMUBGHYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.32

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.53

+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between GMUB and GHYB is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GMUB vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison

GMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than GHYB's 7.08% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMUB
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
3.19%3.14%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GHYB
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.08%7.00%6.65%6.20%5.67%4.46%4.75%5.57%5.68%1.45%

Drawdowns

GMUB vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMUB drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMUB and GHYB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMUBGHYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-21.48%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.99%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.18%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-2.61%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.80%

-0.01%

Volatility

GMUB vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) is 1.12%, while Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that GMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMUBGHYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

2.05%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

2.68%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

5.54%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.38%

7.68%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

8.35%

-4.97%