GMOV vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMOV (GMO U.S. Value ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GMOV is passively managed, while FUNL is actively managed. Over the past year, GMOV returned 27.00% vs 18.97% for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

GMOV vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOV achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

GMOV

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOV vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF	10.24%	14.81%	-1.27%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOV and FUNL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024	0.84

The correlation between GMOV and FUNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GMOV vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOV

GMOV Risk / Return Rank: 79
GMOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GMOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GMOV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GMOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GMOV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOV vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMOV	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.19	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	3.26	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.47	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.46	5.01	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.05	23.31	-8.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GMOV vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOV and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMOV	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.19	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.95	+0.07

Drawdowns

GMOV vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOV and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOV	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-19.35%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.08%	-3.83%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.12%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-3.54%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.82%	+0.98%

Volatility

GMOV vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that GMOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMOV	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	0.00%	+2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.26%	5.24%	+2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	8.82%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	15.16%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.94%	15.29%	-0.35%

GMOV vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GMOV and FUNL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

GMOV vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

GMOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF	2.02%	1.98%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOV and FUNL in my portfolio?

GMOV and FUNL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMOV or FUNL?

GMOV has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOV dropped -16.71% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, GMOV or FUNL?

On 1-year performance, GMOV leads with 27.00% vs 18.97% for FUNL. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMOV or FUNL?

Over the 1-year period, GMOV has performed better with a 27.00% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOV or FUNL?

GMOV and FUNL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOV or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 2.02% for GMOV.

What is the main difference between GMOV and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and CornerCap.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.