GMOV vs. ZVC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO).
GMOV and ZVC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMOV is a passively managed fund by GMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Value (Gross). It was launched on Oct 28, 2024. ZVC.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2017. Both GMOV and ZVC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF | 2.83% | 14.81% | -1.27% |
ZVC.TO BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF | 5.26% | 36.54% | -3.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
GMOV is traded in USD, while ZVC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZVC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOV achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than ZVC.TO's 5.26% return.
GMOV
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 17.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZVC.TO
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- 42.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.79%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ZVC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GMOV
ZVC.TO
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) and BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOV | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 2.79 | -1.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 3.67 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.57 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 3.99 | -2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 22.50 | -16.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOV | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.79 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOV and ZVC.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Dividend Comparison
GMOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than ZVC.TO's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOV GMO U.S. Value ETF | 2.17% | 1.98% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZVC.TO BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF | 2.13% | 2.23% | 2.87% | 3.32% | 2.96% | 2.41% | 3.30% | 2.66% | 2.67% |
Drawdowns
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum ZVC.TO drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOV and ZVC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOV | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -41.00% | +24.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -11.03% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -1.82% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -5.02% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.08% | +0.72% |
Volatility
GMOV vs. ZVC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO U.S. Value ETF (GMOV) is 3.34%, while BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC.TO) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that GMOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZVC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMOV | ZVC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 4.48% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 9.44% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 15.49% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.85% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 20.36% | -4.85% |