GMOM vs. MRGR
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR).
GMOM and MRGR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMOM is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014. MRGR is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Merger Arbitrage Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2012.
Performance
GMOM vs. MRGR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMOM vs. MRGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 7.43% | 20.63% | 6.75% | 0.65% | -2.82% | 19.13% | 2.42% | 8.24% | -9.61% | 20.67% |
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF | 1.30% | 11.99% | 5.32% | 4.94% | -4.81% | 6.58% | 1.99% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 2.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOM achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than MRGR's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GMOM has outperformed MRGR with an annualized return of 7.24%, while MRGR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.34% annualized return.
GMOM
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
MRGR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 11.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMOM vs. MRGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than MRGR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMOM vs. MRGR — Risk / Return Rank
GMOM
MRGR
GMOM vs. MRGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) and Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMOM | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 2.60 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 4.27 | -1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.57 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 6.76 | -4.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 22.96 | -11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOM | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.60 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.12 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOM and MRGR is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GMOM vs. MRGR - Dividend Comparison
GMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than MRGR's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOM Cambria Global Momentum ETF | 1.64% | 3.01% | 2.16% | 3.63% | 2.52% | 3.42% | 1.24% | 2.60% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% | 1.88% |
MRGR Proshares Merger ETF | 2.99% | 3.12% | 3.21% | 2.11% | 0.61% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 1.39% | 0.36% | 0.74% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
GMOM vs. MRGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOM drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than MRGR's maximum drawdown of -13.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOM and MRGR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOM | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -13.23% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -1.52% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -8.40% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | -13.23% | -11.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.70% | -0.17% | -5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -3.90% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 0.49% | +2.03% |
Volatility
GMOM vs. MRGR - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Momentum ETF (GMOM) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Proshares Merger ETF (MRGR) at 1.44%. This indicates that GMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMOM | MRGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 1.44% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 3.39% | +8.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 4.31% | +11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 3.80% | +10.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 5.19% | +7.57% |