GMOI vs. YCS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - GMOI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Value, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GMOI returned 42.85% vs 21.34% for YCS. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GMOI charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

GMOI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOI achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 4.11% return.

GMOI

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 6.07%
• 6M: 13.00%
• YTD: 20.68%
• 1Y: 42.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 34.22%

YCS

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -5.17%
• 6M: 5.08%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 1Y: 21.34%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 22.90%
• 10Y*: 13.21%
• ALL TIME*: 6.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	$8.04M	$4.71M	$3.16M
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	$2.37M	$2.29M	$1.56M

GMOI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	20.68%	45.64%	-4.48%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	4.11%	9.04%	4.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOI and YCS is -0.39, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	-0.32

Return for Risk

GMOI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMOI

GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 95
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 95

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 59
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMOI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMOI	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	1.31	+1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	1.71	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.26	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.15	2.53	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.75	9.53	+11.22

GMOI vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOI Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOI and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GMOI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOI drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOI and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOI	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.67%	-49.56%	+34.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-8.48%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-8.48%	+7.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-19.75%	+18.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.24%	-0.17%

Volatility

GMOI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) is 3.53%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that GMOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GMOI	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	5.88%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.72%	11.84%	-1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	16.43%	-3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.37%	21.21%	-5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.37%	18.61%	-3.24%

GMOI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

GMOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	2.65%	2.74%	0.54%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMOI and YCS in my portfolio?

GMOI and YCS have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GMOI or YCS?

YCS has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to GMOI (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOI dropped -14.67% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, GMOI or YCS?

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 42.85% vs 21.34% for YCS. On fees, GMOI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GMOI or YCS?

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 42.85% return vs 21.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOI or YCS?

GMOI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOI or YCS?

GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between GMOI and YCS?

GMOI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: GMO and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GMOI and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.