PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMOI vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMOI vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMOI achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


GMOI

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.82%
YTD
13.04%
6M
17.00%
1Y
36.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOI vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
13.04%45.64%-4.57%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GMOI and YCS is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMOI vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMOI
GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMOI vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMOIYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

1.92

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.86

2.44

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.35

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

3.97

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.44

12.40

+5.05

GMOI vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMOI Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMOI and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMOIYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.92

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.13

0.33

+1.80

Drawdowns

GMOI vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOI drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOI and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMOIYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.67%

-49.56%

+34.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-8.30%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-19.93%

+18.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.66%

-0.55%

Volatility

GMOI vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that GMOI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMOIYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.75%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

12.32%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

17.27%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

21.10%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

19.01%

-3.42%

GMOI vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMOI vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

GMOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
2.42%2.74%0.54%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMOI and YCS have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMOI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOI dropped -14.67% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 36.69% vs 32.82% for YCS. On fees, GMOI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 36.69% return vs 32.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GMOI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

GMOI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. GMOI tracks MSCI World ex USA Value, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: GMO and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GMOI and 1.00% for YCS.

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMOI and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer