GMOI vs. JHID
GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) and JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. GMOI is passively managed, while JHID is actively managed. Over the past year, GMOI returned 37.41% vs 33.27% for JHID. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMOI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JHID.
Performance
GMOI vs. JHID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GMOI having a 14.33% return and JHID slightly higher at 14.44%.
GMOI
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHID
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 14.44%
- 6M
- 15.78%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOI vs. JHID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 14.33% | 45.64% | -4.48% |
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 14.44% | 41.47% | -3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOI and JHID is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GMOI and JHID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOI vs. JHID — Risk / Return Rank
GMOI
JHID
GMOI vs. JHID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMOI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | 3.83 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.08 | 14.82 | +2.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMOI vs. JHID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOI drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, which is greater than JHID's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOI and JHID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -12.42% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -8.42% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -2.45% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.18% | -0.05% |
Volatility
GMOI vs. JHID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) is 4.15%, while John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that GMOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOI | JHID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.46% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.62% | 10.86% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 13.06% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 13.97% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 13.97% | +1.65% |
GMOI vs. JHID - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JHID's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOI vs. JHID - Dividend Comparison
GMOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than JHID's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.39% | 2.74% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF | 2.85% | 3.13% | 5.15% | 5.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GMOI and JHID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JHID has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to GMOI (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMOI dropped -14.67% vs JHID's -12.42%.
On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 37.41% vs 33.27% for JHID. On fees, JHID is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 37.41% return vs 33.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHID is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
JHID has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.39% for GMOI.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GMOI and 0.46% for JHID.
GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMOI and JHID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer