GMOD vs. DWAT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. GMOD charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.

Performance

GMOD vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GMOD

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DWAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMOD vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	1.01%
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

GMOD vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMOD	DWAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	—	—

Drawdowns

GMOD vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMOD drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOD and DWAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMOD	DWAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	0.00%	-6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	0.00%	-1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.16%	0.00%	-1.16%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMOD	DWAT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.95%	0.00%	+8.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.95%	0.00%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.95%	0.00%	+8.95%

GMOD vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMOD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMOD vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	0.88%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GMOD or DWAT?

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMOD or DWAT?

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMOD or DWAT?

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

What is the main difference between GMOD and DWAT?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GMOD and 1.83% for DWAT.