GMOC vs. UYLD
GMOC (GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF) and UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMOC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for UYLD.
Performance
GMOC vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOC achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than UYLD's 1.94% return.
GMOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UYLD
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOC vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMOC GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.65% | 0.76% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.94% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOC and UYLD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOC vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GMOC
UYLD
GMOC vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMOC | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 8.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.33 | 5.98 | +2.35 |
Drawdowns
GMOC vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOC drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum UYLD drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOC and UYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOC | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -0.54% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.03% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
GMOC vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOC | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49% | 0.65% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.49% | 1.00% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.49% | 1.00% | -0.51% |
GMOC vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOC vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison
GMOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than UYLD's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMOC GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF | 2.33% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOC and UYLD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for UYLD.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.33% for GMOC.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GMOC and 0.29% for UYLD.
Find the right allocation for GMOC and UYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer