GMOC vs. CUSD
GMOC (GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMOC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.
Performance
GMOC vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMOC achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 2.37% return.
GMOC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CUSD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOC vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMOC GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.85% | 0.70% |
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 2.37% | -0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMOC and CUSD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMOC vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank
GMOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CUSD
GMOC vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMOC | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMOC vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMOC drawdown since its inception was -0.14%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMOC and CUSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMOC | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -5.42% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -2.48% | +2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.49% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.16% | — |
Volatility
GMOC vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMOC | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50% | 15.70% | -15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.50% | 7.83% | -7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.50% | 7.83% | -7.33% |
GMOC vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMOC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMOC vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison
GMOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than CUSD's 13.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 13.73% | 14.05% | 7.10% | 3.62% | 1.14% |
GMOC GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF | 2.33% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMOC and CUSD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.
CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.73%, compared with 2.33% for GMOC.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GMOC and 0.81% for CUSD.
Find the right allocation for GMOC and CUSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer