GMMA vs. WAMA

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds - GMMA tracks the MarketVector GammaRoad U.S. Equity Strategy Index while WAMA tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMMA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.

Performance

GMMA vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GMMA

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: 2.51%
• YTD: 3.69%
• 1Y: 8.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WAMA

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMMA vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF	3.12%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GMMA and WAMA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

GMMA vs. WAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMMA

GMMA Risk / Return Rank: 57
GMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

WAMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMMA vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GMMA	WAMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	—	—

Drawdowns

GMMA vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMMA drawdown since its inception was -5.21%, smaller than the maximum WAMA drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMA and WAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GMMA	WAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-5.73%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.71%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-1.43%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMMA	WAMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.16%	13.67%	-7.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.32%	13.67%	-6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.32%	13.67%	-6.35%

GMMA vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMMA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMMA vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison

GMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than WAMA's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF	3.44%	3.00%	0.57%
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMMA and WAMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GMMA and WAMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GMMA or WAMA?

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GMMA or WAMA?

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GMMA or WAMA?

GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.42% for WAMA.

What is the main difference between GMMA and WAMA?

GMMA tracks MarketVector GammaRoad U.S. Equity Strategy Index, while WAMA tracks WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Index. They also come from different issuers: GammaRoad Capital Partners and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GMMA and 0.32% for WAMA.