GMMA vs. ORO
GMMA (GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF) and ORO (Arrow Valtoro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GMMA is passively managed, while ORO is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GMMA charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ORO.
Performance
GMMA vs. ORO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMMA achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than ORO's -0.13% return.
GMMA
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORO
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMMA vs. ORO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 1.98% | 1.51% |
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | -0.13% | -9.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMMA and ORO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMMA vs. ORO — Risk / Return Rank
GMMA
ORO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GMMA vs. ORO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF (GMMA) and Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMMA | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMMA vs. ORO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMMA drawdown since its inception was -5.21%, smaller than the maximum ORO drawdown of -12.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMMA and ORO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMMA | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -12.89% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -12.89% | +10.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -6.71% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | — | — |
Volatility
GMMA vs. ORO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMMA | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.05% | 23.53% | -17.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.34% | 23.53% | -16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.34% | 23.53% | -16.19% |
GMMA vs. ORO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMMA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ORO's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMMA vs. ORO - Dividend Comparison
GMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while ORO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMMA GammaRoad Market Navigation ETF | 3.70% | 3.00% | 0.57% |
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMMA and ORO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMMA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMMA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ORO.
GMMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.00% for ORO.
They also come from different issuers: GammaRoad Capital Partners and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GMMA and 1.25% for ORO.
Find the right allocation for GMMA and ORO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer