GMLGX vs. AFNIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GMLGX (GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund) and AFNIX (AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMLGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for AFNIX.

Performance

GMLGX vs. AFNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GMLGX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 22.67%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 11.40%
• 10Y*: 13.64%

AFNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMLGX vs. AFNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	7.49%	14.26%	22.35%	25.27%	-19.10%	26.33%	22.21%	28.12%	-5.53%	20.65%
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	1.74%	11.36%	16.23%	6.59%	-8.77%	25.23%	6.60%	25.71%	-1.98%	19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GMLGX and AFNIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between GMLGX and AFNIX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GMLGX vs. AFNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMLGX

GMLGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
GMLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GMLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GMLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GMLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GMLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMLGX vs. AFNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund (GMLGX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GMLGX	AFNIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GMLGX	AFNIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GMLGX	AFNIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.45%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GMLGX	AFNIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.67%	—	—

GMLGX vs. AFNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMLGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than AFNIX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

GMLGX vs. AFNIX - Dividend Comparison

GMLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, less than AFNIX's 31.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I	31.18%	14.13%	6.88%	3.43%	4.61%	1.78%	1.75%	2.13%	2.04%	1.72%	1.79%	2.66%
GMLGX GuideMark Large Cap Core Fund	17.20%	18.49%	4.20%	0.75%	10.27%	3.03%	0.38%	1.01%	2.22%	4.25%	2.99%	3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GMLGX and AFNIX in my portfolio?

GMLGX and AFNIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.