PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMIN.TO vs. OSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) and OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GMIN.TO is traded in CAD, while OSW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OSW values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMIN.TO achieves a -8.22% return, which is significantly lower than OSW's 29.16% return.


GMIN.TO

1D
1.38%
1M
-7.53%
6M
-11.79%
YTD
-8.22%
1Y
123.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
88.17%

OSW

1D
-1.49%
1M
-5.92%
6M
33.95%
YTD
29.16%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
33.81%
5Y*
23.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMIN.TO
G Mining Ventures Corp
-8.22%284.17%20.54%
OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
29.16%0.34%65.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GMIN.TO and OSW is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GMIN.TO:

CA$9.05B

OSW:

$2.64B

EPS

GMIN.TO:

$1.48

OSW:

$0.75

PE Ratio

GMIN.TO:

18.32

OSW:

34.52

PEG Ratio

GMIN.TO:

0.08

OSW:

0.66

PS Ratio

GMIN.TO:

10.11

OSW:

2.71

PB Ratio

GMIN.TO:

3.50

OSW:

4.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

GMIN.TO:

$623.23M

OSW:

$989.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GMIN.TO:

$430.96M

OSW:

$135.02M

EBITDA (TTM)

GMIN.TO:

$514.55M

OSW:

$113.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMIN.TO vs. OSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMIN.TO
GMIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

OSW
OSW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
OSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSW Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
OSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSW Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) and OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMIN.TOOSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.33

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

3.07

+4.36

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the OSW Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMIN.TO and OSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.60%, smaller than the maximum OSW drawdown of -83.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMIN.TO and OSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMIN.TOOSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.60%

-83.89%

+40.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.60%

-18.88%

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.44%

-10.44%

-24.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-26.96%

+15.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.71%

8.14%

+8.57%

Volatility

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Volatility Comparison

G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.46% compared to OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) at 9.36%. This indicates that GMIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMIN.TOOSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.46%

9.36%

+12.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.23%

25.71%

+30.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.53%

33.55%

+35.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.07%

38.92%

+21.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.07%

55.21%

+4.86%

Dividends

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Dividend Comparison

GMIN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GMIN.TO
G Mining Ventures Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
0.73%0.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.79%

Financials

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between G Mining Ventures Corp and OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
137.64M
247.63M
(GMIN.TO) Total Revenue
(OSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GMIN.TO vs. OSW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between G Mining Ventures Corp and OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
64.6%
15.1%
Portfolio components
GMIN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, G Mining Ventures Corp reported a gross profit of 88.88M and revenue of 137.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

OSW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 37.43M and revenue of 247.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

GMIN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, G Mining Ventures Corp reported an operating income of 83.72M and revenue of 137.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 60.8%.

OSW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 22.87M and revenue of 247.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

GMIN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, G Mining Ventures Corp reported a net income of 79.05M and revenue of 137.64M, resulting in a net margin of 57.4%.

OSW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited reported a net income of 21.33M and revenue of 247.63M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GMIN.TO and OSW have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMIN.TO and OSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer