PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMHZX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMHZX achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GMHZX has outperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 8.63%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.


GMHZX

1D
0.86%
1M
0.63%
6M
5.76%
YTD
7.98%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
8.63%
ALL TIME*
6.13%

SSBRX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.45%
6M
4.67%
YTD
6.58%
1Y
12.12%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
7.61%
ALL TIME*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
7.98%15.50%11.48%15.82%-16.48%13.07%12.91%22.18%-6.84%18.55%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.58%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GMHZX and SSBRX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.96

The correlation between GMHZX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMHZX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMHZX
GMHZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GMHZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMHZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMHZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GMHZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMHZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMHZXSSBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.92

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

12.67

-2.65

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMHZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMHZX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMHZX drawdown since its inception was -56.35%, which is greater than SSBRX's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMHZX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMHZXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.35%

-21.96%

-34.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-4.44%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.04%

-7.36%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-21.13%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

-21.96%

-5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.15%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-3.68%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.02%

+0.62%

Volatility

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.51%. This indicates that GMHZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMHZXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.51%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

4.88%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.46%

5.93%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.25%

8.86%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.13%

9.75%

+2.38%

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMHZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMHZX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

GMHZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, less than SSBRX's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
5.24%5.66%7.10%3.67%7.20%5.38%3.08%3.40%7.27%3.86%0.87%19.84%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.69%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GMHZX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMHZX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to SSBRX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMHZX dropped -56.35% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMHZX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer