PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMHZX vs. GFSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMHZX achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 0.11% return.


GMHZX

1D
0.23%
1M
3.71%
YTD
7.98%
6M
8.57%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
8.96%

GFSYX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.96%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
7.98%15.50%11.48%15.82%-16.48%13.07%12.91%22.18%-6.84%6.36%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
0.11%5.49%7.60%5.98%-0.57%4.96%-0.17%4.94%0.14%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GMHZX and GFSYX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2017

0.20

The correlation between GMHZX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMHZX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMHZX
GMHZX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GMHZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMHZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMHZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GMHZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMHZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GFSYX
GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMHZXGFSYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.21

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.02

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

4.27

+8.18

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMHZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMHZX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMHZXGFSYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.10

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.27

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.89

-0.52

Drawdowns

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMHZX drawdown since its inception was -56.35%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMHZX and GFSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMHZXGFSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.35%

-9.54%

-46.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-1.34%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.04%

-4.49%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-4.49%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-0.91%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.65%

+0.92%

Volatility

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund (GMHZX) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.92%. This indicates that GMHZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMHZXGFSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

0.92%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

1.95%

+5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

2.54%

+6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

3.67%

+7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.22%

3.72%

+8.50%

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMHZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMHZX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

GMHZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, less than GFSYX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
7.17%7.18%8.54%13.00%4.20%1.59%1.53%2.24%2.17%0.70%0.00%0.00%
GMHZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2035 Fund
5.24%5.66%7.10%3.67%7.20%5.38%3.08%3.40%7.27%3.86%0.87%19.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMHZX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMHZX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to GFSYX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMHZX dropped -56.35% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

GMHZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMHZX and GFSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer