PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMGZX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's 1,644,791.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX has underperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 11.90%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 173.61% annualized return.


GMGZX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.45%
YTD
10.86%
6M
10.13%
1Y
24.52%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
11.90%

FRAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1,599,541.56%
YTD
1,644,791.35%
6M
1,644,517.81%
1Y
1,729,686.80%
3Y*
2,590.99%
5Y*
609.45%
10Y*
173.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMGZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund
10.86%19.19%15.12%19.50%-17.62%17.15%13.94%24.93%-8.09%21.75%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
1,644,791.35%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%10.28%-2.05%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and FRAMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.80

The correlation between GMGZX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGZX
GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMGZXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-548,102.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

76,384.47

-76,383.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

523,435.99

-523,433.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

2,185,767.38

-2,185,755.00

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMGZXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.63%

-33.94%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-3.45%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-5.02%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-16.31%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.63%

-16.31%

-13.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-3.82%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.82%

+1.25%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) is 4.66%, while Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a volatility of 967.33%. This indicates that GMGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMGZXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

967.33%

-962.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

967.35%

-957.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

1,592,536.58%

-1,592,524.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

712,487.94%

-712,473.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

503,504.00%

-503,488.93%

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMGZX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than FRAMX's 102.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
102.97%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
GMGZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund
3.46%3.83%4.44%2.85%5.99%5.27%2.10%4.10%7.97%4.58%4.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMGZX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.33%) compared to GMGZX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

GMGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMGZX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer