GMGZX vs. GGBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX).
GMGZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 29, 2011. GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund | -2.05% | 19.19% | 15.12% | 19.50% | -17.62% | 17.15% | 13.94% | 24.93% | -8.09% | 21.75% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than GGBFX's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
GMGZX
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -2.05%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMGZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank
GMGZX
GGBFX
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMGZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.41 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.06 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 4.31 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMGZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | -0.10 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.43 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.69 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMGZX and GGBFX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison
GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGZX GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund | 3.91% | 3.83% | 4.44% | 2.85% | 5.99% | 5.27% | 2.10% | 4.10% | 7.97% | 4.58% | 4.01% | 0.00% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
Drawdowns
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, which is greater than GGBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and GGBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMGZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.63% | -27.03% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -3.80% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -20.84% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.63% | -20.97% | -8.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.64% | -5.48% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -4.64% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 0.94% | +1.45% |
Volatility
GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that GMGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMGZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 1.76% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 2.63% | +6.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 4.00% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 4.91% | +9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 4.49% | +10.51% |