PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMGZX vs. GGBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGZX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than GGBFX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


GMGZX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.97%
YTD
11.37%
6M
12.11%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
11.50%

GGBFX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
-0.51%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMGZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund
11.37%19.19%15.12%19.50%-17.62%17.15%13.94%24.93%-8.09%21.75%
GGBFX
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund
0.38%7.55%0.40%5.77%-13.90%-2.57%5.03%11.04%-4.74%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGZX and GGBFX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.39

The correlation between GMGZX and GGBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (5 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMGZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGZX
GMGZX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GMGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GGBFX
GGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMGZXGGBFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

0.97

+1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

1.43

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

1.04

+1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.88

3.30

+9.58

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the GGBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGZX and GGBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMGZXGGBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

0.97

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

-0.10

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.39

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.71

-0.10

Drawdowns

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGZX drawdown since its inception was -29.63%, which is greater than GGBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGZX and GGBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMGZXGGBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.63%

-27.03%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-3.80%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-6.01%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-20.84%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.63%

-20.97%

-8.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.85%

+3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.64%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.19%

+0.84%

Volatility

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund (GMGZX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.50%. This indicates that GMGZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMGZXGGBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

1.50%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

3.15%

+6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

4.07%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

4.97%

+9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

4.51%

+10.53%

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGZX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMGZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison

GMGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGBFX
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund
3.05%3.05%2.88%1.10%0.95%3.55%1.44%3.29%3.13%3.45%3.96%4.01%
GMGZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2055 Fund
3.44%3.83%4.44%2.85%5.99%5.27%2.10%4.10%7.97%4.58%4.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMGZX and GGBFX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMGZX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to GGBFX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGZX dropped -29.63% vs GGBFX's -27.03%.

GMGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMGZX and GGBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer