GMGEX vs. UCEQX
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX).
GMGEX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Nov 25, 1996. UCEQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012.
Performance
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 3.72% | 29.14% | 4.12% | 22.27% | -17.07% | 14.99% | 9.55% | 25.45% | -13.04% | 26.39% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | -0.78% | 23.71% | 14.50% | 19.36% | -16.25% | 19.68% | 10.76% | 22.49% | -12.06% | 22.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMGEX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than UCEQX's -0.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GMGEX having a 9.93% annualized return and UCEQX not far ahead at 10.39%.
GMGEX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 30.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
UCEQX
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 22.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GMGEX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank
GMGEX
UCEQX
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMGEX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.38 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 1.99 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.95 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 9.45 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMGEX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.38 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.61 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.63 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.63 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMGEX and UCEQX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison
GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than UCEQX's 5.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMGEX GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund | 4.52% | 4.69% | 0.29% | 5.62% | 7.81% | 7.76% | 3.83% | 3.14% | 3.14% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 4.20% |
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 5.12% | 5.08% | 2.56% | 5.10% | 6.80% | 4.61% | 8.25% | 4.79% | 6.73% | 1.91% | 3.16% | 3.63% |
Drawdowns
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and UCEQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMGEX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.47% | -35.33% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -11.75% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.58% | -25.24% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.98% | -35.33% | +0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -6.34% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -4.92% | -11.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 2.43% | +0.23% |
Volatility
GMGEX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) have volatilities of 6.09% and 5.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMGEX | UCEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 5.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 9.65% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 16.60% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 15.22% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 16.46% | -0.44% |