PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMGEX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGEX achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 11.60% return.


GMGEX

1D
1.87%
1M
1.85%
6M
12.88%
YTD
19.52%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
11.15%
ALL TIME*
4.09%

GQFPX

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.13%
6M
4.87%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
19.52%29.14%4.12%22.27%-17.07%0.63%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
11.60%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGEX and GQFPX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between GMGEX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMGEX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GMGEX
GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMGEXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.30

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

2.80

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

7.14

+7.72

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGEX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMGEXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.47%

-16.95%

-41.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-6.28%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-10.57%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

-16.95%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.46%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-3.03%

-13.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.45%

-0.04%

Volatility

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.28%. This indicates that GMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMGEXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.28%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

8.32%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

10.18%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

12.78%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

12.81%

+3.16%

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMGEX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than GQFPX's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
3.95%4.69%0.29%5.62%7.81%7.76%3.83%3.14%3.14%2.90%3.71%4.20%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.52%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMGEX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMGEX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to GQFPX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGEX dropped -58.47% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMGEX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer