PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMGEX vs. GIOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GMGEX having a 19.27% return and GIOTX slightly lower at 18.54%. Over the past 10 years, GMGEX has underperformed GIOTX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while GIOTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.


GMGEX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.86%
YTD
19.27%
6M
21.08%
1Y
41.55%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
11.28%

GIOTX

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.51%
YTD
18.54%
6M
21.26%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
28.31%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
11.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
19.27%29.14%4.12%22.27%-17.07%14.99%9.55%25.45%-13.04%26.39%
GIOTX
GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund
18.54%43.70%10.66%21.03%-12.41%11.14%7.43%24.45%-19.66%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGEX and GIOTX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.94

The correlation between GMGEX and GIOTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMGEX vs. GIOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGEX
GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

GIOTX
GIOTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GIOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMGEXGIOTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.51

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.97

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.01

15.62

+2.40

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is comparable to the GIOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGEX and GIOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMGEXGIOTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31

2.78

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.90

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.34

-0.09

Drawdowns

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, roughly equal to the maximum GIOTX drawdown of -56.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and GIOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMGEXGIOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.47%

-56.51%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-10.66%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-13.40%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

-29.68%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-39.29%

+4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.26%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-14.24%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.70%

-0.38%

Volatility

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) is 4.01%, while GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GIOTX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that GMGEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMGEXGIOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.40%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

11.99%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

15.22%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

15.39%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.34%

-0.28%

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GIOTX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GMGEX vs. GIOTX - Dividend Comparison

GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than GIOTX's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIOTX
GMO International Developed Equity Allocation Fund
6.78%8.04%5.07%6.54%4.45%6.67%4.48%3.74%3.90%3.15%4.04%3.39%
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
3.93%4.69%0.29%5.62%7.81%7.76%3.83%3.14%3.14%2.90%3.71%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GMGEX and GIOTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GIOTX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to GMGEX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGEX dropped -58.47% vs GIOTX's -56.51%.

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMGEX and GIOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer