PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMGEX vs. ATWYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMGEX achieves a 19.27% return, which is significantly higher than ATWYX's 11.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GMGEX has underperformed ATWYX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while ATWYX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


GMGEX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.86%
YTD
19.27%
6M
21.08%
1Y
41.55%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
11.28%

ATWYX

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.21%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.19%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
19.27%29.14%4.12%22.27%-17.07%14.99%9.55%25.45%-13.04%26.39%
ATWYX
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy
11.47%21.44%18.72%20.55%-18.58%20.45%12.70%25.56%-9.76%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GMGEX and ATWYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2003

0.94

The correlation between GMGEX and ATWYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMGEX vs. ATWYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMGEX
GMGEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GMGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ATWYX
ATWYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ATWYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATWYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATWYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ATWYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATWYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) and AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMGEXATWYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.41

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

2.95

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.01

13.19

+4.83

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMGEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the ATWYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMGEX and ATWYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMGEXATWYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31

2.26

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.72

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.44

-0.19

Drawdowns

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMGEX drawdown since its inception was -58.47%, roughly equal to the maximum ATWYX drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMGEX and ATWYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMGEXATWYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.47%

-59.14%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-9.75%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-17.58%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

-26.21%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-34.33%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.69%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-9.98%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.18%

+0.14%

Volatility

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund (GMGEX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) at 3.66%. This indicates that GMGEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATWYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMGEXATWYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.66%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

10.10%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

12.74%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

16.01%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

16.75%

-0.69%

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMGEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ATWYX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMGEX vs. ATWYX - Dividend Comparison

GMGEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, which matches ATWYX's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATWYX
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy
3.96%4.41%2.49%1.84%5.88%5.81%1.23%4.93%5.57%12.93%3.16%7.84%
GMGEX
GMO Global Equity Allocation Fund
3.93%4.69%0.29%5.62%7.81%7.76%3.83%3.14%3.14%2.90%3.71%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, GMGEX and ATWYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMGEX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to ATWYX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMGEX dropped -58.47% vs ATWYX's -59.14%.

GMGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMGEX and ATWYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer