PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMF vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMF vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMF achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 105.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GMF has outperformed KORU with an annualized return of 9.15%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively lower 4.90% annualized return.


GMF

1D
-1.10%
1M
-2.73%
6M
5.01%
YTD
10.08%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
9.15%

KORU

1D
-14.72%
1M
-59.41%
6M
40.56%
YTD
105.44%
1Y
347.48%
3Y*
53.48%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
4.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMF vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
10.08%21.99%16.55%8.20%-18.99%-1.93%24.96%19.92%-14.25%41.71%
KORU
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares
105.44%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GMF and KORU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

0.71

The correlation between GMF and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

GMF vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GMF
KORU

Technology

40.8%
63.4%

Financial Services

15.4%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
5.5%

Industrials

7.3%
15.2%

Communication Services

6.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.4%

Healthcare

4.5%
2.5%

Energy

3.1%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.3%

Utilities

2.0%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Technology

GMF
40.8%
KORU
63.4%

Financial Services

GMF
15.4%
KORU
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GMF
10.7%
KORU
5.5%

Industrials

GMF
7.3%
KORU
15.2%

Communication Services

GMF
6.4%
KORU
2.1%

Basic Materials

GMF
5.8%
KORU
1.4%

Healthcare

GMF
4.5%
KORU
2.5%

Energy

GMF
3.1%
KORU
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

GMF
2.9%
KORU
1.3%

Utilities

GMF
2.0%
KORU
0.3%

Real Estate

GMF
1.0%
KORU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMF vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMF
GMF Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMF Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMF vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GMFKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.97

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

14.03

-8.57

GMF vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMF and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GMF vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMF drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMF and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMFKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.18%

-95.79%

+28.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.62%

-70.51%

+57.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-73.34%

+51.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.78%

-92.74%

+58.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.18%

-95.79%

+55.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-70.51%

+65.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-57.39%

+40.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

24.92%

-21.30%

Volatility

GMF vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) is 7.02%, while Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 70.60%. This indicates that GMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMFKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

70.60%

-63.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

147.53%

-131.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.29%

151.62%

-133.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

94.03%

-75.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

84.35%

-65.11%

GMF vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMF vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

GMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than KORU's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
1.22%1.49%1.92%2.75%2.54%2.71%1.32%1.75%2.26%1.70%2.49%3.76%
KORU
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.42%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMF and KORU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (70.60%) compared to GMF (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMF dropped -67.18% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, GMF leads with 9.15% vs 4.90% for KORU. On fees, GMF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GMF has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GMF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for KORU.

GMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.42% for KORU.

GMF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KORU is South Korea Equities. GMF tracks S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index, while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GMF and 1.32% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMF and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer