PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMDYX vs. GMWZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMDYX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than GMWZX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GMDYX has underperformed GMWZX with an annualized return of 1.84%, while GMWZX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.29% annualized return.


GMDYX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.84%

GMWZX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.79%
YTD
5.47%
6M
5.89%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
0.10%8.23%1.86%6.28%-14.96%-2.16%9.18%9.81%-0.39%4.11%
GMWZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund
5.47%12.82%8.88%12.64%-14.42%8.94%10.70%18.19%-4.90%14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GMDYX and GMWZX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.02

Over the past year, GMDYX and GMWZX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMDYX vs. GMWZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMDYX
GMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GMWZX
GMWZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GMWZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMWZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMWZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GMWZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMWZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMDYXGMWZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.66

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

12.06

-5.92

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the GMWZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMDYX and GMWZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMDYXGMWZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.22

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.62

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.81

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.42

-0.26

Drawdowns

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMDYX drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, smaller than the maximum GMWZX drawdown of -51.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMDYX and GMWZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMDYXGMWZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.08%

-51.44%

+28.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-5.59%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.60%

-7.91%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-19.61%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.75%

-21.65%

+0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-0.44%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-6.27%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.23%

-0.26%

Volatility

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) is 1.42%, while GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund (GMWZX) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that GMDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMWZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMDYXGMWZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

2.28%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

5.42%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

6.70%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

8.45%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

9.05%

-4.10%

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMDYX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GMWZX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMDYX vs. GMWZX - Dividend Comparison

GMDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than GMWZX's 6.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
4.44%4.53%4.67%3.56%1.87%1.87%4.82%4.09%2.78%2.11%2.09%3.25%
GMWZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2025 Fund
6.17%6.51%7.59%3.19%7.34%4.83%3.88%3.78%6.58%3.93%3.35%16.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMDYX and GMWZX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMWZX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to GMDYX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMDYX dropped -23.08% vs GMWZX's -51.44%.

GMWZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMDYX and GMWZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer