PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMDYX vs. GLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMDYX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than GLDYX's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GMDYX has underperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 1.84%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.26% annualized return.


GMDYX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.84%

GLDYX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.04%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
0.10%8.23%1.86%6.28%-14.96%-2.16%9.18%9.81%-0.39%4.11%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.57%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GMDYX and GLDYX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.68

The correlation between GMDYX and GLDYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (10 years) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMDYX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMDYX
GMDYX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GMDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GMDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMDYXGLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.69

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.88

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

16.16

-10.02

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMDYX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMDYXGLDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.90

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

1.17

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

1.46

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.66

-0.50

Drawdowns

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMDYX drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMDYX and GLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GMDYXGLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.08%

-11.73%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-1.04%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.60%

-1.04%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-6.68%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.75%

-6.68%

-14.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-0.18%

-2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-2.16%

-4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.25%

+0.72%

Volatility

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.44%. This indicates that GMDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GMDYXGLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.44%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.01%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

1.38%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

1.82%

+4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

1.55%

+3.40%

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GMDYX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GMDYX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GMDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than GLDYX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.10%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%
GMDYX
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund
4.44%4.53%4.67%3.56%1.87%1.87%4.82%4.09%2.78%2.11%2.09%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GMDYX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMDYX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to GLDYX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMDYX dropped -23.08% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GMDYX and GLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer