GMDYX vs. GFSYX
GMDYX (GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund) and GFSYX (GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund) are both mutual funds - GMDYX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GFSYX is a Multistrategy fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 5 years, GMDYX returned 0.00%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for GFSYX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. GMDYX charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for GFSYX.
Performance
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMDYX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than GFSYX's 0.67% return.
GMDYX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
GFSYX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMDYX GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund | 0.57% | 8.23% | 1.86% | 6.28% | -14.96% | -2.16% | 9.18% | 9.81% | -0.39% | 0.75% |
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | 0.67% | 5.49% | 7.60% | 5.98% | -0.57% | 4.96% | -0.17% | 4.94% | 0.14% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMDYX and GFSYX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMDYX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank
GMDYX
GFSYX
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMDYX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 3.03 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 7.23 | -1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMDYX drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMDYX and GFSYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMDYX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.08% | -9.54% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -1.34% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.60% | -4.49% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.30% | -4.49% | -15.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -0.22% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -0.91% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.56% | +0.45% |
Volatility
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund (GMDYX) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.85%. This indicates that GMDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMDYX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 0.85% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | 1.92% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 2.55% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.95% | 3.67% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 3.71% | +1.25% |
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMDYX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMDYX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison
GMDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than GFSYX's 7.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | 7.13% | 7.18% | 8.54% | 13.00% | 4.20% | 1.59% | 1.53% | 2.24% | 2.17% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GMDYX GuideStone Funds Medium-Duration Bond Fund | 4.48% | 4.53% | 4.67% | 3.56% | 1.87% | 1.87% | 4.82% | 4.09% | 2.78% | 2.11% | 2.09% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMDYX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMDYX has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to GFSYX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMDYX dropped -23.08% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.
GFSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMDYX and GFSYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer