GMCOX vs. PCGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX).
GMCOX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. PCGTX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.36% | 6.56% | 1.39% | 6.19% | -14.64% | -2.01% | 8.13% | 8.58% | -1.44% | 2.81% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 2.74% | 7.84% | 0.98% | 5.12% | -13.48% | -0.61% | 5.75% | 6.55% | 0.17% | 2.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMCOX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GMCOX has underperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 1.24%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.63% annualized return.
GMCOX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.24%
PCGTX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMCOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMCOX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank
GMCOX
PCGTX
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMCOX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.43 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 2.29 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.30 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.69 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 7.64 | -3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMCOX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.43 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.05 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.31 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.97 | -0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMCOX and PCGTX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison
GMCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than PCGTX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | 3.54% | 3.54% | 3.39% | 3.40% | 2.27% | 2.16% | 3.49% | 1.45% | 2.38% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 2.55% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 4.43% | 3.78% | 5.36% | 5.02% | 3.67% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 2.96% | 2.71% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMCOX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than PCGTX's maximum drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMCOX and PCGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMCOX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.49% | -19.34% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -3.10% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.75% | -19.20% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.36% | -19.34% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -1.57% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -1.86% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 1.09% | -0.06% |
Volatility
GMCOX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) is 1.59%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that GMCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMCOX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 2.15% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 4.14% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 6.23% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 7.10% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 5.35% | -0.38% |