GMCOX vs. FMBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX).
GMCOX is managed by GuideMark. It was launched on Jun 29, 2001. FMBPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.
Performance
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | -0.60% | 6.56% | 1.39% | 6.19% | -14.64% | -2.01% | 8.13% | 8.58% | -1.44% | 2.81% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | -0.18% | 9.03% | 1.04% | 4.44% | -12.21% | -1.35% | 4.77% | 6.30% | 1.13% | 2.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMCOX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than FMBPX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GMCOX has underperformed FMBPX with an annualized return of 1.21%, while FMBPX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.45% annualized return.
GMCOX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
FMBPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMCOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GMCOX vs. FMBPX — Risk / Return Rank
GMCOX
FMBPX
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMCOX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.25 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.87 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.11 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 5.85 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMCOX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.25 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.03 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.29 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.25 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GMCOX and FMBPX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Dividend Comparison
GMCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than FMBPX's 4.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMCOX GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund | 3.55% | 3.54% | 3.39% | 3.40% | 2.27% | 2.16% | 3.49% | 1.45% | 2.38% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 2.55% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | 4.60% | 4.87% | 4.29% | 3.46% | 2.29% | 1.96% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMCOX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, which is greater than FMBPX's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMCOX and FMBPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMCOX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.49% | -18.34% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -3.15% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.75% | -18.02% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.36% | -18.34% | -2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.85% | -2.19% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -3.29% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.13% | -0.11% |
Volatility
GMCOX vs. FMBPX - Volatility Comparison
GuideMark Core Fixed Income Fund (GMCOX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) have volatilities of 1.58% and 1.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GMCOX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.53% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 3.02% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 5.44% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 6.72% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 5.08% | -0.11% |