GLXU vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLXU (T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLXU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

GLXU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLXU achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.80% return.

GLXU

• 1D: -4.42%
• 1M: -9.31%
• YTD: 3.25%
• 6M: -34.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 2.80%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 15.98%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: 9.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLXU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF	3.25%	-54.75%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	2.80%	7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GLXU and XDSQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

GLXU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLXU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLXU	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.69	-1.04

Drawdowns

GLXU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXU drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXU and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLXU	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.66%	-26.06%	-64.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.07%	0.00%	-77.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.08%	-4.96%	-52.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GLXU	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	176.33%	10.56%	+165.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	176.33%	15.27%	+161.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	176.33%	15.10%	+161.23%

GLXU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLXU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLXU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

GLXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GLXU T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF	7.23%	7.46%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLXU and XDSQ in my portfolio?

GLXU and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GLXU or XDSQ?

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLXU or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GLXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLXU or XDSQ?

GLXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between GLXU and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GLXU and 0.79% for XDSQ.