PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLXU vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLXU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLXU achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 562.84% return.


GLXU

1D
-4.42%
1M
-9.31%
YTD
3.25%
6M
-34.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLXU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GLXU
T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF
3.25%-32.32%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
562.84%5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GLXU and LINT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLXU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLXU vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLXULINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

24.05

-24.39

Drawdowns

GLXU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXU drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXU and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLXULINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.66%

-49.54%

-41.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.07%

-26.55%

-50.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-20.51%

-36.57%

Volatility

GLXU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLXULINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

176.33%

163.04%

+13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

176.33%

163.04%

+13.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

176.33%

163.04%

+13.29%

GLXU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLXU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLXU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

GLXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than LINT's 0.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLXU and LINT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GLXU.

GLXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GLXU and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLXU and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer