PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLXU vs. CRCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLXU vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLXU achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -88.01% return.


GLXU

1D
-4.42%
1M
-9.31%
YTD
3.25%
6M
-34.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRCD

1D
20.12%
1M
35.97%
YTD
-88.01%
6M
-87.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLXU vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLXU and CRCD is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

-0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLXU vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long GLXY Daily Target ETF (GLXU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLXU vs. CRCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLXUCRCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

-0.45

+0.11

Drawdowns

GLXU vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLXU drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLXU and CRCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLXUCRCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.66%

-96.95%

+6.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.07%

-94.31%

+17.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-54.51%

-2.57%

Volatility

GLXU vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLXUCRCDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

176.33%

204.54%

-28.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

176.33%

204.54%

-28.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

176.33%

204.54%

-28.21%

GLXU vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLXU and CRCD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

GLXU vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

GLXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLXU and CRCD have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLXU and CRCD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

GLXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.23%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

GLXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLXU and CRCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer