GLWG vs. NVTX
GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) and NVTX (Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GLWG is passively managed, while NVTX is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for NVTX.
Performance
GLWG vs. NVTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLWG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 46.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVTX
- 1D
- 37.55%
- 1M
- 188.72%
- YTD
- 709.31%
- 6M
- 416.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLWG vs. NVTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 85.97% |
NVTX Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF | 633.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLWG and NVTX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLWG vs. NVTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF (NVTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLWG | NVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.78 | 5.24 | +3.54 |
Drawdowns
GLWG vs. NVTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, smaller than the maximum NVTX drawdown of -89.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and NVTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLWG | NVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.53% | -89.20% | +59.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | -10.79% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -60.85% | +50.14% |
Volatility
GLWG vs. NVTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLWG | NVTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.06% | 266.88% | -115.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.06% | 266.88% | -115.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.06% | 266.88% | -115.82% |
GLWG vs. NVTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NVTX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLWG vs. NVTX - Dividend Comparison
GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVTX Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF | 2.11% | 17.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLWG and NVTX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NVTX.
NVTX has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GLWG and 1.30% for NVTX.
Find the right allocation for GLWG and NVTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer