GLWG vs. MULL
GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GLWG is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
GLWG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GLWG
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 46.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLWG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 85.97% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 486.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLWG and MULL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLWG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
GLWG
MULL
GLWG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLWG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 46.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 8.78 | 7.45 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
GLWG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLWG drawdown since its inception was -29.53%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLWG and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLWG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.53% | -72.29% | +42.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.32% | 0.00% | -10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -20.62% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
GLWG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLWG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.06% | 132.38% | +18.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 151.06% | 136.22% | +14.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 151.06% | 136.22% | +14.84% |
GLWG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLWG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLWG and MULL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GLWG and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for GLWG and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer